Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Oh. Please. No.

No no no.

This is so wrong.

Six stooges are enough.

Via my buddy Julie, who is now on my shit list. Thanks, dear. You have killed my evening ;)

8 comments:

B.B. said...

This is one of the Bowls in John's Revelation, isn't it?

The Fifth String said...

Might be three of them.

Cullen said...

They ARE all stooges, in the willing accomplice meaning of the term.

w/v: pingad - the sound Ken's synapses made when reading this story.

Anonymous said...

I guess this is just another piece of evidence that actual creativity gets squashed like a bug, and the powers that be in Hollywood just want to keep strip-mining the past.

I was never a Stooge fan but this seems terribly wrong to me. I hope people stay away from the movie in droves.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, buddy. Didn't mean to blow your cool. (Speaking of which, what were they smoking when they thought of Sean Penn?!?


wv: lession. (n) Texan for "lesson": "Let this be a lession to you, youngun! Don't smoke dope!"

nightfly said...

Finally, the role Sean Penn was born to play. Or is that the role he's played his whole adult life?

(w/v - rucess - from "rue" and "success," - to immediately regret a triumph, aka "buyer's remorse" - cf "The election of Barack Obama was a great rucess for the working poor.")

JeffS said...

Sean Penn is a stooge, but he is not a Stooge.

This is so wrong. And stupid. I'd rather watch reruns of Bugs Bunny cartoons.

TW: sting. Yes, it does.

Joel said...

Sean Penn as Larry? My favorite stooge?

Moe simply can't slap him enough to suit me.