So with some of the recent RWDB commentary about Matt Tabibi and Anderson Cooper making"teabagging" jokes, I learned a new verb I never knew about before.
My only question is: Why?
Seriously, why? Or rather, WTF?
That does not sound like a very fun or sexually rewarding practice. Not to mention how it must make your partner feel.
Seriously, WTF?
Iz out!
2 months ago
8 comments:
Actually, in World of Warcraft, it's a taunt to another online player. When a player kills another player's character, they squat over the corpse, and "teabag" the corpse.
Don't know where it's from originally, but that's where it gained notoriety.
Yeah, I didn't want to know, either. My husband just told me.
Guess it could be fulfilling to certain kinks, though.
Talk about being completely out of the loop, Ebola had to tell me what it was. GROSS.
And then I got really pissed at what Shuster was saying. Went from stoopid to revolting just that quick.
I really had no idea either. And I'm sorry I learned the definition.
Kind of like that whole foot tapping thing a while back. I could have lived my whole life in blissful ignorance of that, but nooooo.
WTF!?!?!? indeed, Ken.
Well, I guess this throws all your perv credibility right out the window. I'm so ashamed of you, Ken.
No, Em, I think his perv cred is still in place. Just no teabagging.
I didn't know what the hell it was until I watched the Roger Waters' movie Pecker a few years ago.
A couple years ago, someone I knew made a "teabagging" joke, and I totally didn't know what he was referring to.
He explained it to me. I really wish he hadn't. I don't know about the alleged pleasurability of the practice; it sounds more like a humiliation thing to me.
Anyone who aspires to be seen as a "serious" news person but who still makes teabagging jokes is just letting their sophomoric side show way too much.
I think the jokes and such are coming out because that's the BEST they have in their tiny little brains by way of criticizing the whole Tea Party Movement. They have totally allowed their "discussion on issues" centers atrophy, so all they can do when something or someone they disagree with shows up is say they are:
1. stupid
2. evil mastermind
3. stupid YET evil mastermind (the typical way W. was characterized)
4. religious nut
5. make them look pervy
Seriously, the reason I have withdrawn from any public discussion of politics is that the level of discourse is no better than it was on the third grade playground. And that disgusts me.
Post a Comment